The problem with chasing after the leading edge is that you can never take a break. Planned obsolescence is a clause prewritten. You’d think I’d be satisfied being on the leading edge of most of the latest tech trends, but no.
That’s why the term "bleeding edge" was coined.
Growing up in an environment that constantly gave me access to the latest toys has really dulled my sense of novelty.
Why am I writing this? Today, Rogers lists new pricing for Christmas. My beloved V3 RAZR will be $149/$99 on a 3/2 year contract hardware upgrade. When work bought this phone in 2005 May, it cost them $500. Pretty soon everyone and their grandmothers are going to have one. [Rogers is also releasing a hot pink version with proceeds going to breast cancer research.]
Also, 2 days ago, I was locked out of my room, AGAIN, because of my malfunctioning magnetic keycard. Stupid IlcoUnican. The locks should be programmed to your student card. Technology ill-used is an even worse detriment to productivity.
So, am I just arguing with myself as a hollow attempt to show self-control? To placate a more sensible side that I apparently should have? To say that I at least tried to change? Or is it an appeal to some sort of vanity? Do I have a need to have something just because the majority of the population doesn’t understand it and would never have the use for it?
Continue reading →